Comments for The American Freedom Network

Comment on Redefining Marriage? Why? by cptfreedm

cptfreedm — Fri, 08 Feb 2013 19:15:32 +0000

More the homosexual political activists don’t want you to see. When the hack on the, very real, problem of divorce amongst married couples, show them this http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/Articles/000,003.htm

Comment on Resources by Welcome - The Unaccomplished Polymath

Welcome - The Unaccomplished Polymath — Mon, 12 Nov 2012 20:45:41 +0000

[...] American Resource Links [...]

Comment on Participate by Sheople believe anything « fredaquerswatch

Sheople believe anything « fredaquerswatch — Fri, 27 Jul 2012 18:43:35 +0000

[...] What do you think? Share this:TwitterFacebookLike this:LikeBe the first to like this. [...]

Comment on Participate by The American Freedom Network » Blog Archive » Sheople believe anything

The American Freedom Network » Blog Archive » Sheople believe anything — Fri, 27 Jul 2012 18:43:16 +0000

[...] Participate [...]

Comment on Afghanistan Casualty Question by ssgconway

ssgconway — Mon, 25 Jun 2012 00:50:58 +0000

The question begs the obvious answer: They’re hypocrites who practice ‘selective outrage’ when Republicans do these things. When a democrat engages in wars without legal sanction or causus belli, when they sanction torture, assassination, domestic spying, etc., the ex-flower children (and their spiritual progeny) deafen us with the sound of their silence.

Comment on Participate by The American Freedom Network » Blog Archive » 801 Oh My!

The American Freedom Network » Blog Archive » 801 Oh My! — Tue, 19 Jun 2012 17:38:44 +0000

[...] Participate [...]

Comment on Unconstitutional Separations by Nik

Nik — Mon, 18 Jun 2012 17:08:19 +0000

I disagree. I think the second comment is excellent and understand completely his position. I disagree only in matter of application. Seems to me that in the current climate of suppression of faith based activity (prayers, mentions of God or religion) by INDIVIDUALS contravenes both freedom of speech AND freedom of “exercise thereof”. I disagree with ANY “mandate” or requirement that others participate in the activity. Standing by a minute while others do isn’t forced participation.

Many on the right forget this; “Madison and his evangelical allies had a completely different concept. They wanted to promote religion. They just believed that the best way to promote religion was for government to leave it alone.”
http://ow.ly/bEGcq

Comment on Unconstitutional Separations by Alan

Alan — Mon, 18 Jun 2012 12:26:12 +0000

The letter is pretty clear to me. Doesn’t seem to back up the argument from the long comment above. http://ow.ly/bE6kE

Comment on Unconstitutional Separations by CPT

CPT — Mon, 18 Jun 2012 12:10:37 +0000

Interesting PBS production – same topic – http://ow.ly/bE53V

Comment on Unconstitutional Separations by CPT

CPT — Mon, 18 Jun 2012 12:10:08 +0000

Thanks for the thoughtful and detailed comment. We all get better when we talk the issues. Love the name Doug InDeap too. A little light on citations to support your point. The last one won’t instill confidence necessarily coming from a bastion of collectivist thought and politics. Separation of Church and State isn’t and has NEVER BEEN a “bedrock principle” of the Constitution. It isn’t in there. The prinicple is the prohibition of the Federal gov’t ESTABLISHING a “national” government supported CHURCH (denomination/sect). Thanks again Doug, an excellent read.